Apple, Google, and Microsoft Battle for your
Internet Experience
Compare the business models and areas of strength of
Apple, Google and Microsoft.
Although they have different
business models and strategies, Apple, Google and Microsoft are three major
companies who seek to dominate the Internet user’s experience. They come to the
platform with their own proprietary strengths. In looking at business models,
Apple’s business model focuses on the consumer and bringing them a personalized
web experience through their hardware (iPads, iPhones, iPods and iMacs), their
two major OS systems, Mac OS X and iOS and through internet. Although their
model limits what type of software customers can access, they offer over
250,000 apps through their iOS app store.
Apple’s business model
mainly focuses on mobile devices such as iPhones and iPads which account for
52% of its profit. They already have a head start on the mobile phone industry
where they have over 250000 applications. Apple controls 27% of the mobile
market and the iPhone is the highest grossing cellphone ever.
Whereas, Google’s business
model focuses the market from the mobile, advertising and operating systems.
The strengths of Google are that they dominate in advertising with their search
engine and their Android OS controls 41% of the mobile market share. The mobile
market is constantly growing three times faster than the iPhone market share.
They bought Android Ins. to enter mobile market. They also bought Motorola Ins.
for 12.5 billion.
Meanwhile, Microsoft’s
business model is operating systems which 95%of all computers use worldwide.
The strengths of Microsoft are that they are still the leader in PC operating
systems and desktop productivity software. But, has failed miserable with
regards towards smartphone hardware and software, mobile computing, cloud-based
software apps, its Internet portal.
Why
is mobile computing so important to these three firms? Evaluate the mobile
platform offerings of each firm.
Mobile computing is so important to
these firms because of the fundamental paradigm shift. The environment is a
$400 billion e-commerce marketplace and the applications used enrich the
experience of using a mobile device. Mobile computing is the most important and
critical business segments of both Google and Apple. Apple has gained various
advantages in the industry in terms of mobile supremacy which tends to serve it
well. People now want to use their mobile phone in the mast sophisticate ways
and above all through speech recognition. The most of the new phones allow us
to use internet, access email, listen to music and so on. The innovations are
to speak to our phone and be able to use it as a personal assistant. The three
competitors are fighting hard to give us the best model and platform.
Apple uses a closed proprietary system
and apps that only provide through iTunes. Whereas, Google aggressively
following the eyeballs. It has introduced Android mobile operating system for a
host of non-Apple devices. Open non-proprietary system that allows users to use
any apps through any resources unlike iTunes. Meanwhile, Microsoft trying to nr
partner with Apple and make Bing, default search engine for both iPhone and
Apple’s web browser. That would provide Microsoft with a much needed boost to
its fledgling search service.
What
is the significance of applications and Apps stores to the success and failures
of mobile computing?
The success of the mobile computing
relies heavily upon the apps stores and applications of the mobile. In this
market, Apple is the one that dominates. The new ecosystem based mobile
applications open opportunities for the carriers, who could develop their own
apps stores based on user information according to the consumer’s data usage.
Apps greatly enrich the experience of using a mobile device and without them,
the predictions for the future of mobile Internet would not be nearly as
bright. Whoever creates the most appealing set of devices and applications will
derive a significant competitive advantage over rival companies. Apple makes
money on each app sold through its App store. That’s worth billions of dollars
to the company. Even if an app is free, Apple still has an advantage because
users must visit Apple’s App store. However, app developers have complained
that making money is too difficult. Apple has blocked some apps from its mobile
devices. Apple claimed it violated user privacy. Google has worked very hard to
increase the number of apps available for Android based mobile devices by
encouraging developers to increase the number of apps. Google also makes money
by embedding advertising in some of the apps used Droid-based devices.
Which
company and business model do you believe will prevail in this epic struggle?
Explain your answer.
Google has the major share of the
advertising market, however Microsoft and Apple will be major threat to them.
As long as there is potential money at stake, Microsoft Corporation and Apple
will stop at nothing to overturn and destroy its competitive advantage. Apple
has had a significant lead in mobile computing for several years. However, as
more companies, Google, Microsoft and others continue to expand into the arena,
its lead will be threatened. Google still reins web-based services through
their search engine. But like Steve Job’s idea, who dreams and keep continuing
to developing new technology will become top.
What
difference would it make to business or individual consumer if Apple, Google or
Microsoft demands the internet experience? Explain your answer.
Apple is leading apps compare to
Google, but Google is catching up through the Android operation system and by
encouraging app developer. If there is useful or good apps that consumer
demands and right choice of choosing which platform to go for, that will be
success for next few years. Switching costs play into both scenarios not just
in terms of phone purchases but the price of apps. Once a user purchases and
adjusts to using a certain platform it’s difficult and expensive to switch to a
whole different system.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete